Dr.NateNeph said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
Dr.NateNeph said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
CanadaChris said:That holds where the measurement is reliable.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.
Dr.NateNeph said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Pushing back on Dr.NateNeph here. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.