TinaHashiRN said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Dr.PulmRoch said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
Dr.PulmRoch said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
That reframing is the part I needed. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.