Dr.BariatricHTX said:

If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.

Same pattern here, and in the same order.

PharmacoVig_BOS said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.

hans_munich said:

It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Nothing to add that would improve it.

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.