LipidDoc_ATL said:Dr.SportsMedIN said: ...regarding the trial evidence...
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
sarah_nash92 said:Forest plot interpretation for the the trial evidence meta-analysis: when reading the pooled estimate, pay attention to: Point estimate (HR/RR/OR) —…
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.
LipidDoc_ATL said:Dr.SportsMedIN said: ...regarding the trial evidence...
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne concrete data point for the thread. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.