Following on from Dr.PathRoch — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
SandraNC_45 said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
SandraNC_45 said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsSandraNC_45 said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.