Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Following on from Dr.SurgeonPGH — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
kate.chem said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
I read this differently from kate.chem, on substance rather than tone. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultskate.chem said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.
kate.chem said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.