SleepDoc_PDX said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
SleepDoc_PDX said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Coming at SleepDoc_PDX’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemReporting back.
Follow-up: I read the paper rather than the summary and the qualifier I was missing was in the second paragraph of the results.
TrialTracker_MD said:Follow-up: I read the paper rather than the summary and the qualifier I was missing was in the second paragraph of the results.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.