Dr.EndoEP said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
robert_kc said:Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them.
Dr.EndoEP said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. No action needed from anybody.