SarahChen_PharmD said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Coming at SarahChen_PharmD’s question from a different direction. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
One concrete data point for the thread. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after SarahChen_PharmD’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
wendy_avl said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Pushing back on wendy_avl here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.