VanRx_Mike said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
VanRx_Mike said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
BariatricNurseD said:Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
That reframing is the part I needed. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
VanRx_Mike said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne concrete data point for the thread. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.