denise_HTX said:No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Second this. Nothing to add that would improve it.
denise_HTX said:No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after denise_HTX’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
jason_paloalto said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.