Following on from hyun_seoul — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
DanielChem_CHI said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Pushing back on DanielChem_CHI here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
DanielChem_CHI said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDanielChem_CHI said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
That reframing is the part I needed. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Reporting back.
Coming back a few months on. It held. Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.