Asked to pay by a method with no recourse, by a supplier I had used twice before without being asked, which is what made me stop.
The narrow version of the question is how people are thinking about the trade-off between reversibility and privacy, because you cannot have both.
I have searched first, so if this is covered somewhere point me at it and I will read it.
Short answer first, then the reasoning. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
TirzTom said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.EndoEP said:Asked to pay by a method with no recourse, by a supplier I had used twice before without being asked, which is what made me stop.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.