Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
One concrete data point for the thread. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from Dr.LeslieOBGYN — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
Reporting back.
Coming back a few months on. It held. Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.