Dec 30, 2025 at 6:07 AM#21
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
36 9Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor, JenMemphis and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jan 4, 2026 at 7:11 AM#22
Dr.EndoIndy said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
I read this differently from Dr.EndoIndy, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
37 10TinaHashiRN, robert_kc, dan_philly and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jan 9, 2026 at 8:12 AM#23
Dr.EndoIndy said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
38 11TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsJan 14, 2026 at 9:10 AM#24
Dr.EndoIndy said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.
39 12CryptoCarl, MariaRD, AussieAnna and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jan 19, 2026 at 10:05 AM#25
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
40 13TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report