PeptideChemSF said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

PeptideChemSF said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.

PeptideChemSF said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

PedsEndoPhilly said:

It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.

Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.