DeniseRN_TPA said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
One thing that is still open after Dr.AddMedPHL’s answer:
What actually works on a prior-authorisation denial, as opposed to the list of things that sound like they should work?
PeptideChemSF said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
I read this differently from PeptideChemSF, on substance rather than tone. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemPeptideChemSF said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. No action needed from anybody.