pat_auckland said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
pat_auckland said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
LondonLisa said:Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
pat_auckland said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Pushing back on pat_auckland here. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.