Dr.GutHealth said:

The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.

hank_denver said:

One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.

hank_denver said:

One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.

That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.

hank_denver said:

One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Taking it to my next appointment.

Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.