MaxMetOK said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
MaxMetOK said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
That is correct as far as it goes, and here is where it stops going. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsMaxMetOK said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.