TrialTracker_MD said:

There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.

FDA_TrackerJim said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.

Following on from FDA_TrackerJim — and this may be the naive question:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source.