Dr.SleepRoch said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Dr.SleepRoch said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
DadBodDave said:Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Dr.SleepRoch said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.