The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Sep 14, 2024 at 11:53 AM#21
Last edited: Sep 14, 2024 at 2:53 PM
45 18steve_okc, dave_SLC, FDA_TrackerJim and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sep 14, 2024 at 7:49 PM#22
Following on from anders_CPH — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Last edited: Sep 14, 2024 at 8:49 PM
46 19anna.melb_AU, mark_tokyo, hans_munich and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sep 15, 2024 at 3:45 AM#23
kate.chem said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Pushing back on kate.chem here. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
47 20oliver_london, tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsSep 15, 2024 at 11:41 AM#24
kate.chem said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
48 21JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sep 15, 2024 at 7:37 PM#25
kate.chem said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
49 22bri_stats, pete_manc_UK, anna.melb_AU and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report