🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsVerified VendorsBiotech Peptides review — my results so far Page 4

Biotech Peptides review — my results so far

patPC_UT Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 9:07 AM 45 replies 2,756 viewsPage 4 of 9
DerekSJ_a1c
Member
378
1,678
Aug 2024
San Jose, CA
Jul 10, 2024 at 2:40 PM#16
Dr.AddMedPHL said:
Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.

14 12adam_van, Dr.SurgeonPGH, rachel_ABQ and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NurseKim_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Jul 10, 2024 at 4:46 PM#17

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

Last edited: Jul 10, 2024 at 9:46 PM
15 13raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO, pete_nash and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DanielChem_CHI
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
Mar 2024
Chicago, IL
Jul 10, 2024 at 6:52 PM#18
NurseKim_ATL said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

16 14patPC_UT, Dr.DermMIA, fiona_VT and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
SarahChen_PharmD
VIP Member
4,567
22,341
Dec 2023
San Diego, CA
Jul 10, 2024 at 8:58 PM#19
NurseKim_ATL said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

Coming at NurseKim_ATL’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

17 15TinaHashiRN, robert_kc, dan_philly and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Jul 10, 2024 at 11:04 PM#20

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.

Last edited: Jul 11, 2024 at 3:04 AM
39 12PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

WWB June 2026 batch — Janoshik results 99.1% semaglutide3 replies
GGPeps (GYC) tirzepatide — PeptideMeter grade A, 98.7% purity9 replies
QSC semaglutide US warehouse — 4 day delivery, 98.4% HPLC9 replies
WWB vs QSC vs GGPeps — which should I go with?18 replies
My first order from WWB — nervous but it arrived perfectly8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register