Following on from PharmacoVig_BOS — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
raj_cambridge said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
raj_cambridge said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardsraj_cambridge said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Reporting back.
Closing this out: the trough rather than the peak explains the pattern I was seeing on day six, which I had been blaming on the vial.