pat_auckland said:I want to add the drug interaction perspective on the pharmacology.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
pat_auckland said:I want to add the drug interaction perspective on the pharmacology.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
Dr.PulmRoch said:The mechanism is more central than most summaries suggest.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.
pat_auckland said:I want to add the drug interaction perspective on the pharmacology.
Pushing back on pat_auckland here. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. Carry on.