🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsOther Peptides & Research CompoundsDihexa nootropic peptide — what worked for you? Page 3

Dihexa nootropic peptide — what worked for you?

AmyNC_wife Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 6:47 AM 16 replies 1,516 viewsPage 3 of 4
anna.melb_AU
Member
678
2,890
Apr 2024
Melbourne, AU
Sep 2, 2025 at 5:07 PM#11
Dr.KarenChen said:
Amycretin (AMY/GLP-1 dual agonist) emerging data relevant to the pharmacology: Phase 1 showed -13.1% body weight at only 12 weeks, the fastest…

Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Taking it to my next appointment.

45 18DerekSJ_a1c, paige_pharma, emma_london and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.BariatricHTX
Senior Member
1,456
7,234
Feb 2024
Houston, TX
Sep 2, 2025 at 7:53 PM#12

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

Last edited: Sep 3, 2025 at 1:53 AM
46 19pete_RVA, CarlaRPh_TPA, steph_laguna and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NurseKim_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Sep 2, 2025 at 10:39 PM#13
NurseLeah_Nash said:
I want to add the drug interaction perspective on the pharmacology.

Pushing back on NurseLeah_Nash here. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.

Last edited: Sep 3, 2025 at 3:39 AM
47 20ingrid_STO, pete_nash, hank_denver and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
PeptideChemSF
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Jan 2024
San Francisco, CA
Sep 3, 2025 at 1:24 AM#14

One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

48 21ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Sep 3, 2025 at 4:09 AM#15

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.

49 22PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

BPC-157 oral vs injectable — bioavailability review and evidence15 replies
TB-500 for tissue repair — mechanism and clinical evidence4 replies
Selank and Semax — anxiolytic peptides overview2 replies
CJC-1295/Ipamorelin combination — GH secretagogue discussion23 replies
BPC-157 + GLP-1 stacking for gut healing — N=1 experience17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register