The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Following on from Dr.CardioMD — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
PeptideSynthNJ said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
I read this differently from PeptideSynthNJ, on substance rather than tone. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsPeptideSynthNJ said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
PeptideSynthNJ said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.