VanRx_Mike said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
VanRx_Mike said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
hank_denver said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.