One concrete data point for the thread. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
Following on from claudia_zurich — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
LabKate said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
I read this differently from LabKate, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsLabKate said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
LabKate said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Taking it to my next appointment.