Dr.PulmRoch said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Pushing back on Dr.PulmRoch here. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
Dr.PulmRoch said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
Dr.PulmRoch said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
Dr.ReproEndo said:Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.