Admin said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Admin said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
One concrete data point for the thread. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
TrialTracker_MD said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
I read this differently from TrialTracker_MD, on substance rather than tone. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.