SarahChen_PharmD said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Mine went the same way, slower. Posting only so the count is not one.
SarahChen_PharmD said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Mine went the same way, slower. Posting only so the count is not one.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after SarahChen_PharmD’s answer:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
PeptideSynthNJ said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.