Dr.RaviCardio said:

Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…

No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.

Dr.RaviCardio said:

Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a…

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.

LibrarianMeg said:

Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…

Second this.

LibrarianMeg said:

Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…

Coming at LibrarianMeg’s question from a different direction. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.