🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHow to read a Certificate of Analysis — complete guide Page 6

How to read a Certificate of Analysis — complete guide

COA_Karl Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 4:00 PM 245 replies 11,691 viewsPage 6 of 20
chris_chi24
Member
389
1,678
Sep 2024
Chicago, IL
Mar 4, 2024 at 5:02 PM#26
HPLC_Greg said:
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 98.4% purity.

My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:

Main peak retention time: 16.5 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 99.5%
Related substances: 0.6% (single impurity at 10.3 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.5 (matches expected molecular weight)

This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.

21 19nick_newbie, DadBodDave, AmyNC_wife and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
nick_SD_fit
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
San Diego, CA
Mar 5, 2024 at 5:01 AM#27
HPLC_Greg said:
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 98.4% purity.

COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis:

  • No HPLC data: If there's no chromatography graph, it's not a real COA
  • Exact 100% purity: Suspicious — real testing always shows slight variation
  • No batch number: Can't trace back to specific production
  • No endotoxin testing: For injectables, this is essential
  • Template looks like it was made in Word: Professional labs have standardized formats

I have seen fake COAs that are literally photoshopped. Always verify independently if possible.

Last edited: Mar 5, 2024 at 7:01 AM
22 20Dr.CardioMD, EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BenResearch_OR
Senior Member
2,456
11,234
Dec 2023
Oregon
Mar 5, 2024 at 5:00 PM#28
HPLC_Greg said:
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 98.4% purity.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.

23 21Dr.NateNeph, PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
julia.endo
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Feb 2024
Cincinnati, OH
Mar 6, 2024 at 4:59 AM#29

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

24 22jason_sac26, chris_chi24, tampaLisa73 and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
COA_Karl
Senior Member
2,123
8,901
Jan 2024
Pennsylvania
Mar 6, 2024 at 4:57 PM#30

Closing the loop on my own question.

For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.

46 19LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
14567820

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register