🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsOther Peptides & Research CompoundsIpamorelin vs Tesamorelin — anyone have experience? Page 3

Ipamorelin vs Tesamorelin — anyone have experience?

PedsEndoPhilly Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 3:05 PM 46 replies 2,741 viewsPage 3 of 10
Dr.GutHealth
Senior Member
1,456
7,890
Mar 2024
Minnesota
Sep 12, 2024 at 8:37 AM#11
Dr.ObesityLA said:
Amycretin (AMY/GLP-1 dual agonist) emerging data relevant to the pharmacology: Phase 1 showed -13.1% body weight at only 12 weeks, the fastest…

That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

41 14VanRx_Mike, steve_okc, dave_SLC and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
greg_boulder
Member
345
1,567
Jul 2024
Boulder, CO
Sep 12, 2024 at 11:50 AM#12
SandraNC_45 said:
The mechanism is more central than most summaries suggest.

This answered a question I did not know how to ask. I will report back once I have actually tried it.

42 15fiona_VT, denise_HTX, raj_cambridge and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NurseAsh_DET
Member
356
1,567
Sep 2024
Detroit, MI
Sep 12, 2024 at 3:03 PM#13
Dr.ObesityLA said:
Amycretin (AMY/GLP-1 dual agonist) emerging data relevant to the pharmacology: Phase 1 showed -13.1% body weight at only 12 weeks, the fastest…

I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

43 16BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy, emily_PDX and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
labquiet_amy
Senior Member
1,234
6,789
Mar 2024
Cambridge, MA
Sep 12, 2024 at 6:16 PM#14

One concrete data point for the thread. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

Last edited: Sep 12, 2024 at 8:16 PM
44 17bri_stats, pete_manc_UK, anna.melb_AU and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Sep 12, 2024 at 9:29 PM#15

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out.

45 18PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

BPC-157 oral vs injectable — bioavailability review and evidence15 replies
TB-500 for tissue repair — mechanism and clinical evidence4 replies
Selank and Semax — anxiolytic peptides overview2 replies
CJC-1295/Ipamorelin combination — GH secretagogue discussion23 replies
BPC-157 + GLP-1 stacking for gut healing — N=1 experience17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register