🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingEndotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C Page 3

Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C

LabKate Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 4:54 AM 17 replies 356 viewsPage 3 of 4
gary_naperville
Member
245
1,123
Oct 2024
Naperville, IL
Jun 8, 2026 at 1:08 PM#11
sarah_TO said:
The provenance questions are more useful than the numbers.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

Last edited: Jun 8, 2026 at 4:08 PM
34 7SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.MetabolicMD
VIP Member
2,345
16,789
Jan 2024
Rochester, MN
Jun 8, 2026 at 2:11 PM#12

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.6% purity, 0.0% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

Last edited: Jun 8, 2026 at 4:11 PM
35 8PedsEndoPhilly, SleepDoc_PDX, RegAffairsDC and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmacoVig_BOS
Senior Member
1,567
8,901
Feb 2024
Boston, MA
Jun 8, 2026 at 3:13 PM#13
NurseAsh_DET said:
COA red flags for certificates of analysis — here's what to look for when reviewing a Certificate of Analysis: No HPLC data: If there's no…

My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:

Main peak retention time: 16.7 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 99.2%
Related substances: 0.4% (single impurity at 10.7 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.5 (matches expected molecular weight)

This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.

Last edited: Jun 8, 2026 at 6:13 PM
36 9DataDave, Dr.GutHealth, amsterdam_pete and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
dave_SLC
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Salt Lake City, UT
Jun 8, 2026 at 4:15 PM#14
LabKate said:
Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself…

My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 4 times from my current compounder. Consistency has been excellent.

Shipping: 2-day priority with gel ice
Packaging: Professional, discreet, proper labeling with lot/batch numbers
Purity: 99.1% average across orders (Janoshik verified)
Customer service: Responsive within 4 hours
Price: $129/month for semaglutide 1.7mg equivalent

37 10FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Jun 8, 2026 at 5:18 PM#15

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.

38 11PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
Janoshik vs in-house testing — third-party verification importance18 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register