paige_pharma said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
paige_pharma said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
paige_pharma said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
One concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from paige_pharma — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Update — tachyphylaxis to the gastric effect, persistence of the appetite effect. Two curves, and I had been watching the wrong one.