A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
SaraMom3 said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Pushing back on SaraMom3 here. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
SaraMom3 said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsSaraMom3 said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
That reframing is the part I needed. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.