anders_CPH said:Closing this out: the trough rather than the peak explains the pattern I was seeing on day six, which I had been blaming on the vial.
Mine went the same way, slower. Posting only so the count is not one.
anders_CPH said:Closing this out: the trough rather than the peak explains the pattern I was seeing on day six, which I had been blaming on the vial.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after anders_CPH’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
Dr.AddMedPHL said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Pushing back on Dr.AddMedPHL here. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.