Dr.PathRoch said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
Dr.PathRoch said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
Dr.PathRoch said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDebRD_ATL said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Posting only so the count is not one.
DebRD_ATL said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.