🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingParticulate matter testing — USP <788> for injectable peptides Page 2

Particulate matter testing — USP <788> for injectable peptides

CarlaRPh_TPA Sat, May 23, 2026 at 9:37 AM 20 replies 606 viewsPage 2 of 4
wendy_avl
Member
245
1,123
Oct 2024
Asheville, NC
May 23, 2026 at 12:35 PM#6
CarlaRPh_TPA said:
They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate.

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$158, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$238
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$108

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

36 6SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
RegAffairsDC
Member
678
3,456
May 2024
Washington, DC
May 23, 2026 at 1:45 PM#7

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe?

Last edited: May 23, 2026 at 3:45 PM
35 5Dr.SportsMedIN, amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
andrew_nyc
Member
534
2,345
Apr 2024
New York, NY
May 23, 2026 at 2:54 PM#8
wendy_avl said:
Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik: Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$158, 10-14 day turnaround…

I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 97.6% purity. That's within acceptable range for compounded peptides. Turnaround was 14 business days.

The test costs ~$144 but gives you actual HPLC chromatography data plus mass spec confirmation. For the peace of mind alone, it's worth every penny. I test every new batch from a new vendor.

Last edited: May 23, 2026 at 7:54 PM
34 4PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo, JessicaM_2024 and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
CarlaRPh_TPA
Senior Member
1,890
8,234
Jan 2024
Tampa, FL
May 23, 2026 at 4:04 PM#9

Closing the loop on my own question.

Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing. The vial was overfilled and pure, which is a very different problem from the one I thought I had.

33 3labquiet_amy, emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
ben_calgary
Member
245
1,123
Oct 2024
Calgary, CA
May 23, 2026 at 9:39 PM#10
andrew_nyc said:
I tested my certificates of analysis batch through Janoshik — 97.6% purity.

No disagreement with andrew_nyc. One condition attached. One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable. "99% pure" without the technique, the standard and the conditions is a claim, not a measurement.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

33 6NauseaFreeNow, SteveThurs, B12Beth and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register