🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingUnderstanding peptide purity percentages — what worked for you? Page 4

Understanding peptide purity percentages — what worked for you?

Dr.LipidDallas Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 5:58 AM 21 replies 1,049 viewsPage 4 of 5
SleepDoc_PDX
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Portland, OR
Apr 2, 2026 at 2:44 AM#16
Dr.NateNeph said:
HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean: Purity %: Should be…

Same pattern here, and in the same order. Nothing to add that would improve it.

Last edited: Apr 2, 2026 at 5:44 AM
48 21pete_nash, hank_denver, carlos_SATX and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SaraMom3
Member
456
2,345
Aug 2024
Ohio
Apr 2, 2026 at 8:02 PM#17
jason_paloalto said:
Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members.

Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight. This confirms identity — not just purity.

Why this matters: HPLC can show you a "pure" compound, but if it's pure of the WRONG compound, purity is meaningless. Mass spec at m/z 4113.58 Da confirms it's actually semaglutide. My Janoshik report includes both HPLC and mass spec.

If your testing provider only offers HPLC, consider upgrading to include mass spec for at least your first batch from a new vendor.

49 22ChrisMacros, KetoKyle, CanadaChris and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PulmRoch
Member
456
2,345
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Apr 3, 2026 at 1:20 PM#18
jason_paloalto said:
Community-verified vendors for certificates of analysis: I maintain a spreadsheet of Janoshik-verified test results submitted by community members.

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.

50 23AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.RheumBOS
Member
567
2,345
Apr 2024
Boston, MA
Apr 4, 2026 at 6:38 AM#19

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads.

My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:

Main peak retention time: 16.8 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 99.5%
Related substances: 0.4% (single impurity at 10.7 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.5 (matches expected molecular weight)

This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.

Last edited: Apr 4, 2026 at 12:38 PM
1 24lori_vegas
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Apr 4, 2026 at 11:55 PM#20

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. No action needed from anybody.

Last edited: Apr 5, 2026 at 1:55 AM
23 21PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register