PharmHunterJen said:Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause.
Pushing back on PharmHunterJen here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
PharmHunterJen said:Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
PharmHunterJen said:Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause.
That reframing is the part I needed. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Dr.RaviCardio said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Mine went the same way, slower.