🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMASH / Liver DiseaseHepatic steatosis grading on ultrasound — 6 month update Page 3

Hepatic steatosis grading on ultrasound — 6 month update

pete_manc_UK Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 2:26 AM 16 replies 1,944 viewsPage 3 of 4
TrialNerd_Beth
Senior Member
2,345
11,234
Jan 2024
Bethesda, MD
Jun 14, 2024 at 10:47 PM#11
pete_nash said:
The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.

Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.

13 11RickReta_CO, PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BrianDallas92
Member
312
1,456
Oct 2024
Dallas, TX
Jun 15, 2024 at 10:42 PM#12
Dr.RaviCardio said:
Liver imaging follow-up for liver and MASH: FibroScan at baseline showed CAP score 331 dB/m (moderate steatosis) and stiffness 9.8 kPa (possible…

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.

14 12mona_PHX, andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mel_PDX
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Portland, OR
Jun 16, 2024 at 10:37 PM#13
pete_nash said:
The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.

Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.

Last edited: Jun 17, 2024 at 4:37 AM
15 13PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
TirzTom
Senior Member
2,789
9,876
Feb 2024
Florida
Online
Jun 17, 2024 at 10:31 PM#14

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.

Last edited: Jun 18, 2024 at 2:31 AM
16 14SandraNC_45, Dr.EndoIndy, tom_AK and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Jun 18, 2024 at 10:25 PM#15

Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source.

Last edited: Jun 19, 2024 at 2:25 AM
17 15PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Survodutide MASH Phase 2b — histological improvement data9 replies
Semaglutide and MASH — liver fat reduction quantification13 replies
Non-invasive MASH biomarkers — FibroScan, ELF, FIB-4 on GLP-110 replies
ALT normalization rates on GLP-1 — pooled trial data20 replies
GLP-1 hepatoprotection — direct vs indirect mechanisms16 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register