🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingIs 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice

Is 98% purity actually good or should I be worried — need advice

kim_atl_prep Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 2:58 PM 13 replies 1,095 viewsPage 1 of 3
kim_atl_prep
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Atlanta, GA
Jan 21, 2026 at 2:58 PM#1

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

So the question, as narrowly as I can put it: whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong.

Not looking for reassurance. Looking for the part I have got wrong.

6 1PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TirzTom
Senior Member
2,789
9,876
Feb 2024
Florida
Online
Jan 21, 2026 at 3:03 PM#2

Short answer first, then the reasoning. Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself calibrated, the gradient and column, the detection wavelength, and where the integration baseline was drawn. A percentage point or two between competent labs is expected. What is not expected is a large gap, and the usual explanation there is that one report is not of the batch in your hand.

Happy to go further on any of that.

Last edited: Jan 21, 2026 at 7:03 PM
5 0tom_AK, josh_phd_bmore, roxy_nash and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pete_RVA
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Richmond, VA
Jan 21, 2026 at 3:08 PM#3
TirzTom said:
Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself…

That is correct as far as it goes, and here is where it stops going. One addition: an unstated method makes a report close to uninterpretable. "99% pure" without the technique, the standard and the conditions is a claim, not a measurement.

Last edited: Jan 21, 2026 at 8:08 PM
4 24Admin, Dr.Martinez, mike_mod and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
mike_mealprep
Member
412
1,890
Jul 2024
Chicago, IL
Jan 21, 2026 at 3:13 PM#4
kim_atl_prep said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

Same position here, arrived at the long way round. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

3 23mel_PDX, Dr.AddMedPHL, newstart_MO
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SarahChen_PharmD
VIP Member
4,567
22,341
Dec 2023
San Diego, CA
Jan 21, 2026 at 3:40 PM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

My vendor review relevant to certificates of analysis: ordered 3 times from my current compounder. Consistency has been excellent.

Shipping: Next-day with cold pack
Packaging: Professional, discreet, proper labeling with lot/batch numbers
Purity: 98.0% average across orders (Janoshik verified)
Customer service: Responsive within 2 hours
Price: $152/month for tirzepatide 10mg equivalent

2 22robert_kc, dan_philly
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register