nancy_portland said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
nancy_portland said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
nancy_portland said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
DeniseRN_TPA said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.