🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingHow to commission independent testing — need advice

How to commission independent testing — need advice

jennifer_SEA Sat, Oct 4, 2025 at 11:43 PM 13 replies 1,258 viewsPage 1 of 3
This thread is more than 8 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
jennifer_SEA
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Seattle, WA
Oct 4, 2025 at 11:43 PM#1

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

The question I want answered is why two laboratories report different purity for the same batch, and which number to believe.

Tell me what I have not thought of.

47 17lucas_SP_BR, lisa_labSD, adam_van and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmacoVig_BOS
Senior Member
1,567
8,901
Feb 2024
Boston, MA
Oct 4, 2025 at 11:50 PM#2

This one has a reasonably settled answer, so here it is. Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself calibrated, the gradient and column, the detection wavelength, and where the integration baseline was drawn. A percentage point or two between competent labs is expected. What is not expected is a large gap, and the usual explanation there is that one report is not of the batch in your hand.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

46 16Dr.GutHealth, amsterdam_pete, LondonLisa and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NephBHM_UK
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Birmingham, UK
Oct 4, 2025 at 11:57 PM#3
PharmacoVig_BOS said:
Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself…

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

Last edited: Oct 5, 2025 at 5:57 AM
45 15PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN, PeptideChemSF and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
laura_annarbor
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Ann Arbor, MI
Oct 5, 2025 at 12:04 AM#4
jennifer_SEA said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

Same position here, arrived at the long way round. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

44 14laura_annarbor, JenMemphis, pat_auckland and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LindaRN_retired
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Sarasota, FL
Oct 5, 2025 at 12:41 AM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

Third-party testing services for certificates of analysis besides Janoshik:

  • Janoshik: Gold standard for peptide community, ~$150, 10-14 day turnaround
  • Valitech: US-based, ISO 17025 accredited, ~$210
  • Eurofins: Full pharmaceutical testing suite, more expensive but comprehensive
  • ChemTox: Basic identity and purity testing, ~$120

Janoshik is the community standard but any ISO-accredited analytical lab can verify peptide identity and purity. The key is independence — don't rely solely on the vendor's own testing.

43 13mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register