Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
NurseAsh_DET said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
NurseAsh_DET said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Following on from NurseAsh_DET — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?