🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsSide Effects & ManagementGallbladder disease risk — looking for input Page 2

Gallbladder disease risk — looking for input

PharmHunterJen Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 12:32 PM 15 replies 2,145 viewsPage 2 of 3
NurseKim_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Jun 12, 2024 at 11:24 PM#6
LibrarianMeg said:
Gallbladder warning for gallbladder risk: rapid weight loss increases gallstone risk regardless of method.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.

34 4denise_HTX, raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
FDA_TrackerJim
Senior Member
1,567
7,890
Feb 2024
Rockville, MD
Jun 13, 2024 at 3:41 AM#7

One concrete data point for the thread. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

Last edited: Jun 13, 2024 at 6:41 AM
33 3Admin, Dr.Martinez, mike_mod and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PedsEndoPhilly
Member
345
1,890
Jun 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Jun 13, 2024 at 7:58 AM#8
NurseKim_ATL said:
The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

32 2jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
Dr.LeslieOBGYN
Member
567
2,567
May 2024
Dallas, TX
Jun 13, 2024 at 12:16 PM#9

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

31 1NicoleRaleigh, james_edin, FranDenver and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmHunterJen
Member
567
2,345
Jul 2024
Illinois
Jun 14, 2024 at 8:52 AM#10

Closing the loop on my own question.

Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong. The measurement I was reading had moved less than its own week-to-week variation, which somebody said upthread and I did not believe.

19 17mike_mealprep, NicoleRaleigh, james_edin and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Nausea incidence by dose tier — STEP and SURMOUNT meta-analysis16 replies
Constipation on GLP-1: pathophysiology and fiber protocol5 replies
Alopecia on GLP-1 — telogen effluvium differential diagnosis3 replies
Gallbladder disease risk — cholelithiasis data from clinical trials12 replies
Pancreatitis risk assessment — pooled safety analysis15 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register